Many patients ask us about the differences between FUE vs. FUT hair transplants.
Choosing a suitable method can be challenging.
In this blog post, I will compare the FUT and FUE methods, discussing their differences and features.
But there’s more.
As an expert in hair restoration, I’ll also share my opinion on which method is better.
Before we dive in, let me introduce myself. I’m James, the co-founder of Tecnifue International Hair Clinic.
I’ve guided thousands of individuals on their hair transplant journeys at our clinic in Istanbul, Turkey.
If you’re new to the topic of hair transplants in Turkey, I highly recommend reading one of my favorite blogs:
“Hair Transplant In Turkey: Expert Guide to Success (15 Tips).”
Let’s return to our main topic, FUE vs. FUT hair transplant.
Before exploring their features, let’s quickly refresh your memory on these methods if you’re unfamiliar with them.
Ready to dive in?
Let’s get started.
Quick Refresher on FUE vs. FUT Hair Transplant
Let’s quickly refresh your memory about the FUT method.
For a detailed blog on FUE hair transplants, you can read:
FUE Hair Transplant: Costs, Procedure, and Benefits Explained.
So, what is FUT?
The FUT method, also known as the strip method, involves surgically removing a strip of skin tissue from the donor area.
This skin is then cut into smaller pieces, where individual hair grafts are separated and prepared for implantation.
This process leaves a horizontal scar on the back of the head.
In contrast, the FUE method extracts grafts individually without removing a large piece of tissue.
Let’s present the differences more systematically for better understanding.
FUT Hair Transplant Features
- Surgical removal of large skin tissue for graft extraction.
- Up to 2,000 grafts per surgery.
- More invasive with a longer recovery time. Stitches are removed after 10-15 days, depending on the patient’s healing and the size of the stitched area.
- Painful recovery period of the donor area.
- Horizontal scar at the donor area.
FUE Hair Transplant Features
- Individual removal of hair follicles. No cutting or stitching is involved.
- Up to 5,000 grafts or more per surgery.
- Less invasive with a short healing time of the donor area. The average recovery is 7-8 days.
- Generally, there is no pain after the surgery; some discomfort might be experienced.
- No large vertical scar at the donor area, only small white dots at graft extraction points.
Personal Verdict on FUE vs. FUT Hair Transplant
If you’re familiar with my work, you know I love sharing insights based on my experience with thousands of patients.
Here’s something important:
We’ve never performed any FUT hair transplants, so I can’t claim to be an expert on this method.
My experience with FUT comes from helping hundreds of patients who came to our clinic for their second hair transplant after having FUT elsewhere.
Let me explain.
I’ve had the chance to study many FUT scars and see the results of FUT hair transplants up close.
It’s only fair to mention that we’ve had patients who weren’t entirely happy with their FUT results.
But it’s also fair to assume some people are satisfied with their FUT transplants.
Here’s what I’ve observed.
I’ve seen some horrible FUT scars that made me question the surgeon’s expertise.
But I’ve also seen some very neat FUT scars.
FUE vs. FUT Hair Transplant Results Compared
Here’s what I’ve noticed about FUT transplant results.
Most of them tend to look like plugs, which I find unnatural.
This is often called “doll-like” hair in hair restoration discussions.
And it’s not just my observation.
I’ve seen similar results from FUT transplants on other websites, so this look is not unique to the patients who came to our clinic.
However, I agree that I might not be the best expert if you’re considering a FUT hair transplant.
My opinion is entirely unfiltered, and I’m happy to share it if you’re seriously considering FUT.
Reach out to me directly, and I’ll gladly share my knowledge.
I believe you might not fully understand what you’re getting into.
I’m selective about my consultations, but I prioritize patients considering FUT.
Here’s an expert tip.
If you want to have a serious consultation with a surgeon who performs FUT, ask them why they think this method is the best choice.
Is it the best for you or just what they’ve always done?
This is a fair question.
With the content of this blog and our other materials, you’ll be well-equipped to evaluate what’s best for you.
If you’ve made it this far, congratulations!
You’re taking responsibility for your choices and doing your due diligence.
Whether you choose our clinic or another, you’re doing everything possible to make an informed decision.
Which is Better, FUE or FUT Hair Transplant?
If you can read between the lines, you’ve probably noticed I’m not a fan of the FUT method.
I find it outdated, offering no serious benefits in terms of results or technical superiority.
The only advantage might be a lower price tag.
But it’s better to save up until you can afford the FUE hair transplant.
So, when comparing the FUE vs. FUT Transplant, the winner is clear: FUE, definitely FUE.
I believe FUT should retire, and surgeons who still offer it should switch to FUE or DHI.
This isn’t just better for results; it’s also more ethical, in my opinion.
Some may disagree, but I’ll leave it to those who still offer FUT to reconcile with their ethical consciences.
My point is made.
Summing Up
From my experience, FUT is outdated and has no serious benefits other than a lower price.
Many FUT results look unnatural, often described as “doll-like” hair.
While I might not be the best expert on FUT, I’ve seen many FUT scars and results, some terrible and some neat.
My advice?
My strong recommendation is to consider saving up for FUE, a procedure that offers superior results and is more ethical.
It offers better results and is more ethical.
If you’re considering FUT, I encourage you to have an open discussion with your surgeon about why they recommend it.
This will help you make an informed decision.
Is it the best for you or what they’ve always done?
This is a fair question.
With the content of this blog and our other materials, you’ll be well-equipped to make an informed decision.
Hair Transplant Expert Consultation
As someone who has had a hair transplant and guided thousands of people for nearly 15 years, I understand how challenging this decision can be.
Topics such as FUE vs. FUT Hair Transplant are just some of the many questions we answer daily.
Thanks to the internet, good information is more available now than ten years ago.
However, this has also brought new challenges, such as the rise of paid PR.
Influencers and colleagues can use paid PR to sway audiences without emphasizing the importance of proper research.
Getting guidance from true medical consultants who can provide accurate information about your case and options is crucial.
You should have easy access to correct information, which we aim to provide.
Our content is detailed and transparent, and our medical team trains our medical consultants.
They understand the complexities of hair restoration.
Contact us if you’d like our support on your hair restoration journey.
We offer a complimentary consultation to answer all your questions.
This will empower you to make the decision that best fits your needs and wishes.
You can also contact us if you still have any questions about the FUE vs. FUT Hair Transplant.
FAQ
Is FUE or FUT more expensive?
FUE is generally more expensive than FUT.
With FUE, more grafts can be implanted, making it potentially less cost-effective if you’re on a budget and need a high number of grafts.
Is FUE less painful than FUT?
Yes, FUE is less painful than FUT.
The healing time for FUT scars can be painful and long.
The scar size and the medical team’s expertise significantly impact the pain experience.
Why FUT over FUE?
The main reason for choosing FUT over FUE is its lower price.
FUT doesn’t offer better results or medical superiority compared to FUE.